

10 years have passed since MP3Ps were first released, but they are still popular. Despite the fact that most digital products such as PMP, navigations, electronic dictionaries, cell phones, PDAs, voice recorders, etc. are pursuing convergence and basically include MP3 playing functions, it is strange that the popularity of MP3 players is not cooling down. What is the reason why it is continuously popular?
First, there is portability. Most recently released digital devices have portability in mind, but there is no other device than the MP3 that strengthens it as much
.
(I think the MP3P is the only device you can wear around your neck comfortably)
Since the lightest recent product weighed only 15g, it can be said that MP3Ps have established a monopolized characteristic in this sense.
Second, is the lifestyle of Koreans. Many people, including myself do not like just sitting blank faced when they are taking public transport. There are many people who read the newspaper or a book, or listen to music or watch a video clip or DMB, but listening to music with an MP3 player is the most convenient and free thing to do. I think that people probably listen to MP3 players because you just have to put in the earphones and don t have to do much with your hands.
(This is one of the reasons why people do not use PMPs but insist on using MP3Ps. If you watch a video or DMB for a long time in the subway your neck hurts, so people prefer listening to music).
Third, is probably the great efforts of manufacturers. When PMPs were released most specialists and users predicted that the market share of MP3Ps would crawl, but we can confirm that this prediction was completely off the mark. MP3Ps that were limited to listening to music now have video support functions, DMB, flash, dictionary functions, etc. to secure competitiveness, and since differentiated products are continuously being released, they grab the attention of young people who react sensitively to trends.
(There is no other product field that is as portable and has good designs as MP3Ps).
astly, I would like to say sound quality. Almost all digital devices include an MP3 function, but they do not have sound quality as good as MP3Ps.
(All products tend to focus on their main function. PMPs have to show video clips well, navigations have to show directions well, and dictionaries have to have good quantity and quality).
MP3s have to place importance on endless research for the best sound quality.
That was a long introduction. We can confirm that Samsung, which was not evaluated as well as Cowon or iRiver in the past, is getting a good reaction from users with its sound field system called DNSe. It dreams of another rise this time with the DNSe 2.0. Let s look at what points have been strengthened and what changes can be felt through actual tests, through this review.



We can confirm that sound quality has been strengthened in many parts, as shown in the picture above. The goal of the DNSe is to relay optimized sound effects of the original sound source, and perfectly play the sound effects intended by the producer. The DNSe 2.0 was developed to improve unnatural stereo sounds or low tone playing capacity, which were the limits of portable players.


Being a heavy metal fan, I go to concerts often. The sound at a concert hall is much more abundant and stronger, incomparable to the sound of normal digital devices, because extra sounds that are reflected and a sense of space can also be heard in addition to the direct speaker sound. I personally like dry cut off sounds, but this is a function users who want to enjoy an abundant sound like that at a concert hall, will like.



What is the biggest limit of 2 channel sound? As mentioned above, you can only feel a limited sense of space.
(The position of speakers and space is extremely important for an ideal sound, but if you have earphones on, the sound plays directly from the side, so the sense of space is weak).
A 3D speaker was developed to overcome this limit, and electronic technology through division and combination of sounds was used to recreate a three-dimensional sound.


Individual sounds come together to make a song, but because of the characteristic of portable devices, the sounds can be distorted at times.
(Distorted sounds drop the ability to relay the sound source).
The clarity function electrically corrects the sound to improve sound relaying, and expresses a clearer sound.
(This is one of the functions I most wanted, and clarity of sound is a very important factor when listening to various types of music. It is frustrating when the vocal sound gets smothered in effects or the drum beat in unclear, but these parts have been improved, and I very much welcome these improvements).


Not only myself, but most users extremely like high quality low tones.
(I think it could be a unique characteristic of Korean users. There are hardly and products now that have a menu to improve low tones)
However, since the playing capacity of low tones is so different for each device, it is not easy to choose a device or earphones appropriate for satisfactory low tones. The bass enhancer function is one that supports playing high quality low tones, and instead of increasing the sound energy of low tones it uses a missing fundamental theory to create a physical low tone possible substitute, and play extremely low tones.


How precisely a product expresses tiny sound effects is an extremely important factor when deciding whether a sound device is good or bad. It is especially hard to listen to parts where the sound becomes small, outside. The street mode adjusts the volume automatically according to the level of music, to control parts with small volume to an appropriate volume without a separate control, so it rids users of the frustration of adjusting the volume all the time.
(It is not a function like the noise cancelling function, but it is one that could probably be well appreciated when outside).

According to DNSe version, the 1.0+ supported EQ preset and 3D+BE preset, but the 2.0 has much more detailed categories, such as the 3D+BE(Clarity) + EQ preset and Concert hall, Street mode, etc.
(We can confirm that the 2.0 speaker has a separate Movie/Speaker category for products that have an internal speaker, like the 2.0+ or K5).


I received two products to compare the difference in sound between the DNSe and the DNSe 2.0. The K3 and U3 are both popular products with consumers, and have adapted the DNSe 2.0 for a higher sound quality.
Most Samsung products select the sound field of the device to be optimized with its bundle earphones, but since I have never used the bundle earphones since buying an MP3P
(I think that most people who place importance on sound quality use music earphones)
I carried out the test with products users acknowledge. I think that comparing it with the Audio technical CM7-Ti model with outstanding resolution, to confirm detailed sound differences, will be acceptable.

The K3 is the best of its league, is slim and has a simple charm. It is a product that still remains in the high rankings at price comparison websites, more than 6 months after its release. It does lag behind a little in function compared to other companies, but it is a product that even beginners can use easily with its touch pad and direct UI.

The U3, which appears to have been released to compete with the Apple Shuffle or iRiver S7, is a product with the best portability with a weight of just 22.8g. IT has an LCD that is not installed in products of the same league, and has an extremely simple device control, and has a nice design, too. However, the best advantage is its function compared to its price. 4GB models can be purchased now at around 100,000 won, so this product is popular among users who want a high sound quality compared to a low price.

Audio technica s CM7-Ti is a product that is constantly popular among users despite its price which is over 100,000 won. It is a product that has better medium to low tones compared to high tones, but it does not present sound that leans too much to one side, so it has the advantage of playing all types of music well, and has great resolution.





I tested the change between DNSe and DNSe 2.0 with test music samples. The picture above is the sound field selection menu of the K3, and you can see it supports 8 EQs (including user EQ).










Carrying out K3 firmware upgrade adapted the DNSe 2.0, as shown in the picture, and many changes occurred. The 8 EQ selections were upgraded to 12 EQ selections, and 3D and low tone improvement menus were added to the user menu.
(The picture below is the U3 s UI after DNSe 2.0 has been adapted).
As a result of comparatively listening to sample music of various genres, the low tone improvement was most impressive. I could see that the lowest sound ranges that could not be felt with the DNSe were definitely stronger.
(The strong low tones of floor level were extremely attractive).
As a result of tests with a few sound fields
(studio, rock, jazz, ballad, dance, user)
the sound field clarity was improved compared to the past.
(Personally, this was the most satisfactory part for me).
However the range of change in concert hall and 3D sound were too small to feel differentiation.
(The 3D and concert hall function offer a more lively sound when listening to music, but the sounds are dispersed and there is a little lack of detail, so it is a mode I personally would not use. The change is very small, but it does offer a more three-dimensional and full sound, so it could be liked by users who like lively sounds).
@
The street mode does not have a select menu, so tests could not be made on the sound change.


The most important thing about an MP3P is its sound quality. No matter how good the design is and how many functions it has, it is hard to make a good impression on users if it does not have a satisfactory sound quality.
(I have said this before, but the reason why I do not use PMPs is because of sound quality. Portability is not that important because I carry devices in my bag, but the sound quality that is not as good as MP3 players is still a factor that makes me hesitant).
Samsung recently released its new product and is carrying out aggressive marketing. The sophisticated design, strengthened SMS, various functions etc. were enough to grab the attention of users, but the most satisfactory thing was the DNSe 2.0. I think that Samsung manias will increase because of the more diverse sound field selection menu and improved sound quality.
(I hope that investments in sound field technology will continue. Compared to a still picture of other manufacturers, it is good to see a company putting effort into continuous technological development).
I think that the P2, S5 and T10, which will be reviewed soon, and which have the DNSe 2.0, will be popular with the users. I look forward to an equation of Sound=Samsung establishing, through continuous technological developments.